Do immigrants squeeze natives out of bad schedules? Evidence from Italy

Table 9 Alternative measures of foreign population, 2SLS

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
Geographic Unit of Analysis	Province	Province	Province	LLM	LLM
Source for FP	MR	LFS	MR	MR	MR
log (Foreign Population)	‐0.020***	‐0.021***	‐0.014	‐0.054***	‐0.044
	(0.006)	(0.006)	(0.049)	(0.003)	(0.033)
log (Total Population) in Province	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO
log (Total Population) in LLM	NO	NO	NO	YES	YES
Individual and household characteristics	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES
Sectoral Dummies	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES
Trimester FE	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES
Region‐Year FE	YES	YES	NO	YES	NO
Province FE	NO	NO	YES	NO	YES
Year FE	NO	NO	YES	NO	YES
Province Characteristics as of 1995	YES	YES	NO	YES	NO
Observations	684,530	684,530	684,530	684,530	684,530
Standard errors in parentheses
* p<0.01, p<0.05, * p<0.1

Notes: The sample considered is the overall working age population (15‐64) employed at the time of the interview. All estimates follow the baseline specification (see col.4, Table 1). Standard errors are clustered at the geographic unit of analysis. The data sources are LFS (2006‐2008), Municipal Records (MR, 2006‐2008), ISTAT Province Accounts (1995) and Minister of Interior for Residence Permits issued at the province level as of 1995.