Employment chances of immigrants and their children in Germany: does sense of personal control matter?

Table 2 Estimates of the employment equation with LOC

β ^D,α ^M	(1)	(2)
Intercept	−0, 75	−1, 41**
	(−1.71, 0.23)	(−2.41, −0.39)
Age	0, 03**	0, 04**
	(0.01, 0.05)	(0.02, 0.06)
Gender	−0, 57**	−0, 58**
	(−0.70, −0.42)	(−0.72, −0.44)
Low education	−0, 4**	−0, 36**
	(−0.59, −0.21)	(−0.55, −0.17)
High education	0, 27**	0, 26**
	(0.10, 0.44)	(0.09, 0.42)
Immigrant	−0, 34**
	(−0.62, −0.05)
Second generation	−0.11
	(−0.31, 0.08)
Turkish immigrant		−0, 6**
		(−1.02, −0.18)
Central European immigrant		−0, 06
		(−0.60, 0.51)
EU15 immigrant		0.56
		(−0.15, 1.26)
Turkish second generation		−0.41
		(−0.85, 0.01)
Central European second generation		0, 32
		(−0.29, 0.92)
EU15 second generation		0.18
		(−0.28, 0.66)
German second generation		−0.11
		(−0.36, 0.15)
Immigrant foreign language spoken at home		−0.47
		(−1.13, 0.19)
Second generation foreign language spoken at home		−0.16
		(−0.82, 0.49)
Marital status	0.02	0.09
	(−0.13, 0.18)	(−0.08, 0.24)
Children under 16	0, 15**	0, 26**
	(0.001, 0.29)	(0.11, 0.41)
LOC	0, 13**	0, 1**
	(0.05, 0.21)	(0.02, 0.18)

Note: 95 % Bayesian confidence intervals in brackets. These intervals contain 95 % of the posterior probability. If this interval contains 0, the effect measured by the parameter estimate is insignificant
**Significance at the 95 % confidence level